🟥 Red Report: #2

This report analyzes 10 top AI models through SentraCoreAI™’s autonomous trust layer. Audits evaluated hallucination rate, bias drift, injection vulnerability, compliance risk, and framing consistency.

📊 SentraScore™ & Certification Badges

Model	Company	Score	Badge	Summary
Claude	Anthropic	82		Low hallucination, high neutrality. Hallucination <6%, 93% injection block, strong on legal framing.
ChatGPT (GPT-4o)	OpenAI	76		Strong factual grounding, political drift noted. Hallucination: 11%. Occasional prompt avoidance on legal questions.
Mistral 7B	Mistral AI	73		Good factuality, limited defense injection. Low hallucination under controlled prompts. Manual tuning advised.
Gemini	Google DeepMind	68		Factual drift, framing inconsistency. Bias triggered under ambiguous prompts. Lowered stability in compliance outputs.
Command R+	Cohere	65		Strong RAG use, injection needs tightening. Great retrieval, but hallucination occurs under long prompts.
Perplexity	Perplexity AI	64		Live queries strong, consistency weak. Jailbreak resistance average. Depends heavily on query phrasing.
Grok	xAI	61		Entertaining, but unpredictable. Hallucination: 22%. Inconsistent under political phrasing.
Inflection Pi	Inflection AI	59		Emotive bias & framing vulnerabilities. Fails structured compliance prompts. Persuasive tone undermines neutrality.
Bard / Duet AI	Google	58		Stable under facts, but evades traps. System prompt exposure remains unresolved.
Meta AI (LLaMA)	Meta	57		High hallucination rate, poor framing resilience. Citations often fabricated. Failed legal prompt series.